The Builder-First AI Coding Harness

Your time back.That's the product.

Autonomously plan, build, test features in parallel using multiple models together. No terminal. No babysitting.

View Documentation
Works with
ClaudeAnthropicCodexOpenAIGeminiGoogleKimiMoonshotOpenCodeOpen Source

Describe it. Afkode it. Ship it.

From idea to production. Every step automated, verified, and traceable.

01

Multiple features. Zero context switching.

Queue up features, hit start, and Afkode it. Each one moves through planning and execution independently.

  • Plan and execute multiple features in parallel
  • 7 lanes from idea to merged
  • Pause, resume, or archive any feature anytime
  • Real-time status badges show what is happening
afkode — Kanban
Planning1
OAuth2 SSO Integration
12m ago
Webhook System
5m ago
Executing2
Stripe Billing Dashboard
Task 7/153h ago
Email Notifications
1h ago
Complete3
Customer Analytics API
45m ago
PDF Export Module
2h ago
User Onboarding Flow
1d ago
02

Any model. Any provider. Zero markup.

Assign different providers to different activities. Use the right model for the right job. Works with subscriptions and API keys.

  • Mix Claude, Codex, Gemini, Kimi, OpenCode in the same feature
  • Each planning and execution activity independently configurable
  • Works with your existing subscriptions or API keys. No per-token fees
  • Switch models anytime without changing your workflow
afkode — Model Configuration
Planning
Analysis
Claude
Opus 4.5
Blueprint
Claude
Opus 4.5
Q&A
Gemini
Gemini 2.0 Flash
PRD Structure
Codex
GPT-5 Codex
Task Elaboration
Kimi
Kimi 2.5
Execution
Tasks
Codex
GPT-5 Codex
QC Batch
Claude
Sonnet 4.5
Feature QC
Claude
Opus 4.5
ClaudeCodexGeminiKimi
Works with subscriptions and API keys
03

Multiple projects. One dashboard.

Work on different codebases at the same time. Each project has its own kanban, its own features, its own configuration. Switch between them instantly.

  • Add any local project by pointing to its directory
  • Each project gets its own kanban board and feature queue
  • Run features across projects simultaneously
  • Per-project model configuration and settings
afkode — Projects

Projects

Manage your projects and default branches

+ Add Project
supamodeActive
main
···
~/Desktop/supamode·Mar 13
e-commerce-api
main
···
~/Desktop/e-commerce-api·Mar 10
marketing-site
develop
···
~/Desktop/marketing-site·Mar 8
04

From your definition to full architecture.

Before a single line of code, afkode generates requirements, technical blueprint, and task breakdown. Sections build in parallel. Every task knows exactly what to build.

  • PRD, blueprint, and atomic task breakdown generated autonomously
  • Dependency-aware parallel generation. Independent sections build simultaneously
  • Every requirement gets a traceable ID that follows through to code
  • AI asks clarifying questions first, then generates everything
afkode — Planning
Generating
Documents
Spec
Analysis
User Q&A
PRD
Blueprint
Tasks
4/6 documents
Blueprint

1.2 Target System Architecture

Source: PRD §5, §7, §8 · Implements: FR-1, FR-3, NFR-1
Browser
Express Server
landing_routes.js
Landing Page
App.tsx
copy.ts
API Layer
validation.js
controller.js
05

Fresh context, every task. Quality that never degrades.

Each task starts a new AI session with exactly the context it needs. No accumulated confusion. No degradation. Task 47 runs with the same precision as task 1.

  • Each task gets curated context. Not the entire codebase
  • Runs for hours or days unattended. Pause and resume anytime
  • Automatic commits after every completed task
  • Multiple tasks execute based on dependency graph
afkode — Executing
Executing
1.0Stand up the landing Playwright surface
Subtasks0/4
1.0.1Create browser-noise helper scaffold
1.0.2Expand Playwright discovery to include landing specs
1.0.3Add a landing-focused Playwright command alias
1.0.4Verify shared landing test wiring
I'm starting by reading the required planning and codebase documents, then I'll inspect the existing Playwright auth surface before touching any files.
06

Verified before you see it.

The system writes unit, integration, and e2e tests based on the feature spec. It audits your testing infrastructure and adds missing pieces. Testing patterns compound across features.

  • Unit, integration, and e2e tests generated from the feature spec
  • Audits testing infrastructure automatically. Adds what is missing
  • The system learns how to test your codebase and adapts over time
  • Verification loops tied to acceptance criteria. Nothing ships until it passes
afkode — Testing
Executing
QC-5Verify landing test surface and acceptance criteria
Subtasks3/6
5.1Audit test infrastructure
5.2Create unit tests for tasks 1.0-4.0
5.3Create integration tests
5.4Run all tests and iterate
5.5Review code for issues
5.6Final verification and commit
Running test suite... 14 passed, 2 failed. Investigating the failures in FilterBar component...
07

Every decision traced. Every commit real.

Each completed task produces a real git commit with file stats. The full AI work history is preserved. Review what happened at any granularity.

  • Real commit: hash, message, file count, lines added/removed
  • Git diff viewer shows exactly what changed
  • Full chat history: AI reasoning, tool usage, file paths
  • Per-task metrics: duration, tokens, cost
afkode — Task Complete
Complete
← Back to Documents
✓ Completed
2.0Type System Extensions — ActivityId, IPC Schema
15m 39s
DURATION
11.7M
INPUT
29,991
OUTPUT
$0.00
COST
10
DONE
Subtasks
2.1Gather context — read type files
2.2Extend ActivityId union
2.3Extend ChatSessionType union
2.4Create review-types.ts
2.5Extend ipc-schema.ts
2.6Commit all changes
Hashf5c78e11
Messagefeat: extend review type system
Stats9 files +242 -7
generate-preload.ts CHANGED
+ reviewEvents: EventDef[];
+ reviewChannels: ChannelDef[];
events: EventDef[];
08

Every requirement tested. Every test traced.

Requirements get unique IDs in the PRD. Each maps to tasks, to tests, to acceptance criteria. Nothing falls through the cracks.

  • Requirement chain: PRD requirement to task to test file to acceptance criteria
  • Verification tracks coverage per requirement
  • Gaps are identified, not hidden
  • Final verification reports exact coverage percentage
afkode — Review
Complete

Review this implementation

Ask for a walkthrough, report an issue, or prepare the branch for merge.

128m 31s
DURATION
342K
TOKENS
263
FILES
$54.25
COST
+14,588
-5,866
?
Ask Questions
Get a guided explanation of the implementation.
!
Report Bug
Describe a defect and start a bug-fix conversation.
Merge & Ship
Review the branch and prepare the merge flow.
Ask a question, report a bug, or say 'let's merge'...
Send
Tasks13/13
FeatureStatus Enum...
8.2K tokens11:38
Archive/Restore IPC...
11.5K tokens17:17
Save-for-Later, Notif...
16.1K tokens16:37
Image Attachment...
2.3K tokens6:04
QC - Verify Foundation...
15.3K tokens21:16
KanbanBoard 7-Lane...
6.1K tokens10:54
KanbanCard Status...
8.0K tokens9:44
Notification Dropdown...
13.2K tokens17:04
NewFeatureModal...
9.6K tokens12:00
ExecutionLogViewer...
5.9K tokens8:40
TasksPanel Two-Line...
5.2K tokens10:16
QC - Verify UI Comp...
59.7K tokens76:47
Archive/Restore and...
8.2K tokens11:38
Implementation Complete

The engineering behind AFK coding.

Designed to handle any complexity. Adapts to your codebase. Gets smarter over time.

01

Autonomous Planning

Describe what you want to build. The system analyzes your codebase, asks clarifying questions, then generates a requirements document, technical blueprint, and task breakdown with dependencies. Sections build in parallel. Every task knows what to build, which files to touch, and which requirements to satisfy.

Learn more →
02

Context Engineering Engine

Planning generates structured knowledge: requirements, blueprint, task graph. At execution time, the context engine assembles exactly the right information for each task. Relevant requirement sections, blueprint decisions, file references, and test patterns. No guesswork. No hoping the model remembers.

Learn more →
03

Fresh LLM Session Per Task

Each task starts a brand new AI session loaded with its curated context. No accumulated conversation. No context window pollution. No degradation. Task 50 runs with the same precision as task 1. This is only possible because the context engine knows exactly what each task needs.

Learn more →
04

Complexity-Adaptive Execution

The task graph handles any feature size. Simple features produce 5 tasks. Complex features produce 50+. Dependencies determine execution order. Coherence groups ensure related work stays together. The system reads your conventions, your file structure, your existing patterns before writing a single line.

Learn more →
05

Verification at Integration Boundaries

Verification tasks are auto-inserted where groups of related work meet. The system audits your test infrastructure, writes unit, integration, and e2e tests from the spec, and runs them. Every requirement traces to acceptance criteria. Coverage is measured. Gaps are reported, not hidden.

Learn more →
06

Compounding Codebase Knowledge

Testing patterns, infrastructure setup, and project conventions persist across features. A runtime journal captures findings during execution and adapts subsequent tasks. The more you build, the smarter the system gets. Feature 10 builds on everything learned from features 1 through 9.

Learn more →
07

Multi-Model Orchestration

13 independently configurable model assignments across planning and execution. Use Claude for architecture, Codex for implementation, Gemini for fast tasks, Kimi for elaboration. Mix providers in the same feature. Works with your existing subscriptions or API keys. No markup. You pay your provider directly.

Learn more →
08

Implementation Review

When execution completes, review everything in one place. Ask the AI questions about what it built. Report a bug and it fixes it in context. Check diffs, test results, and metrics per task. When satisfied, merge to production with one click. No file handling. No merge conflicts. No terminal.

Learn more →
09

Protected Workspace

Every feature runs in its own git worktree with its own branch. Each completed task produces a real commit. Your main branch stays untouched until you explicitly merge. Your code never leaves your machine. Only AI prompts go to your chosen provider. Full state persistence means crashes, restarts, or interruptions never lose your work.

Learn more →
How We Compare

Features, not Chats.

Afkode treats every input as a structured feature with its own plan, tasks, tests, and branch. Learn what this means →

This comparison was researched in April 2026. These platforms evolve rapidly — there might be small inconsistencies.

Alex, Creator of Afkode
"Screw it. I'll build it myself."

After a year of coding with AI every single day, I knew something was missing.

Cursor, Lovable, Codex, Claude Code. I tried everything. And I shipped a lot.

But I also spent a ridiculous amount of time doing things that had nothing to do with building my product. Managing context. Reviewing changes. Skipping tests because the session was already too long.

The tools are powerful.
The bottleneck was me.

I was the Product Manager, the architect, the QA engineer, and the context window babysitter. All at once. All day. And it was exhausting.

Afkode takes everything I learned and runs it automatically. The planning, the context assembly, the implementation, the testing. All the stuff I used to spend my entire day managing.

Now I spend that time talking to users, defining what to build next, and actually growing my business.

I used early versions of Afkode to build Afkode itself and kept iterating until I trusted it with real work.

For the last two months, I haven't touched a direct AI session. Everything runs through Afkode. I ship with more confidence than ever because every feature is planned, tested, and verified before it gets to me. I'm not going back. And I'm pretty sure you won't either.

If you're spending your days like I was and you want to get back to the work that actually matters, give this a try.

— Alex

Choose your plan

All plans include every feature. Start free, upgrade when you're ready.

7-day free trial · No credit card required

LAUNCH SPECIAL
$199
one-time, forever
Offer ends in
0d0h0m0s
  • All features included
  • Every future update
  • Unlimited projects and features
  • All AI providers supported
  • No API fees from us
  • Desktop app, local code
MONTHLY
$79/mo
flexible monthly billing
  • All features included
  • Every future update
  • Unlimited projects and features
  • All AI providers supported
  • No API fees from us
  • Desktop app, local code
ANNUAL Save 38%
$49/mo
billed annually ($588/yr)
  • All features included
  • Every future update
  • Unlimited projects and features
  • All AI providers supported
  • No API fees from us
  • Desktop app, local code
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Honest answers to the questions founders actually ask.

AFK — away from keyboard. Today's AI coding tools are powerful, but they need you there the whole time: prompting, reviewing, re-explaining context, fixing mistakes, managing files. You're doing the work of a project manager, architect, and QA engineer just to get the AI to write code.

AFK coding flips this. You focus on what only you can do — describing what to build, making product decisions, defining acceptance criteria. The system handles everything else: planning, context assembly, implementation, testing, verification. It runs for hours without intervention, with the same quality on the last task as the first.

No re-explaining. No context pollution. No skipped tests. Every input creates a feature with its own plan, tasks, tests, and branch — not a chat session. You spend your time where it creates the most value. The engineering runs in the background. Read more about AFK coding →

You define what you want to build, answer a few clarifying questions, and click Execute. Every feature gets its own requirements, blueprint, task breakdown, git branch, and verification — not a conversation thread. The system handles everything else:

Planning — analyzes your codebase, generates a requirements doc, technical blueprint, and task breakdown
Execution — implements each task autonomously with a fresh AI session and curated context
Verification — writes and runs tests at integration boundaries
Review — you review diffs, ask questions, report bugs, then merge with one click

Your active time: about 10 minutes. The system does the rest. See the full feature lifecycle →

Claude (Anthropic), Codex (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), Kimi (Moonshot), and any model accessible through OpenCode. Use your existing subscription or API keys — your keys, your rates, zero markup.

Each activity in the pipeline (analysis, planning, execution, testing, review) can use a different provider and model. Use Claude Opus for architecture, Codex for implementation, a lightweight model for classification — all within the same feature. See supported providers and recommended models →

Afkode is built for work where planning, context, and testing matter. The more complex the feature, the more value you get:

• Multi-component features (auth, billing, dashboards)
• Full-stack work that crosses frontend, backend, and database
• Refactors that touch many files
• Batches of related bug fixes
• Repetitive work that needs consistency across many files

For simple one-file changes, use your IDE directly. Afkode is designed for the features that take days, not minutes. See the full use case guide →

Those tools are coding assistants — you guide every step, review each change, and re-explain your codebase every session.

Afkode is different: you describe what you want, approve the plan, and leave. The system executes autonomously through dozens of tasks, each with a fresh AI session and curated context. No context window pollution. No degradation. Task 50 runs with the same precision as task 1. See how the feature lifecycle works →

Every feature goes through a structured verification loop. The system checks each acceptance criterion against the implementation, writes targeted tests (unit, integration, and e2e), runs them, and reports coverage — which criteria passed and which have gaps.

Quality assurance starts before coding: the planning process produces traceable requirements and acceptance criteria. By the time code reaches your main branch, it has been planned, implemented, tested, and verified. Learn about the verification loop →

Yes — full visibility throughout:

During planning: a phase stepper shows which step is active, with live streaming and section-by-section document generation
During execution: the task sidebar shows what's done, what's running, and what's left — with subtask-level progress
After each task: full code diff, execution log, and tool activity are available for review

You can navigate freely between views at any time. Learn about visibility →

When execution completes, a review panel opens. You interact through a single conversation — the system detects what you need automatically:

• Ask questions about the implementation → read-only Q&A
• Report a bug → guided fix with confirmation before any changes
• Test locally → copy the worktree path and run your project from there
• Say "merge" → the system merges to main and pushes to your remote

Nothing touches your main branch until you explicitly approve. Deployment is handled by your own pipeline — we recommend auto-deploying from main. Learn about the review flow →

Everything runs locally on your computer. Your code never touches our servers.

Afkode spawns each AI provider's official CLI directly on your machine. Your API keys and tokens stay local. Prompts go directly from your filesystem to the provider's API. We're not a middleman — we're a workflow layer running entirely on your device. Learn how Afkode runs AI locally →

Yes. Each feature gets its own git worktree and branch, fully isolated. You can plan and execute multiple features at the same time — even across different projects.

Parallel works best when features touch different parts of the codebase. For overlapping work (same files, same components), combine them into one larger request. The system handles any complexity. Learn about parallel development →

The system is designed for resilience at every level:

Your main branch is always protected. Every feature runs in its own isolated workspace. Nothing is modified until you merge.
Crashes are handled. All state is persisted locally. If your computer crashes or you close the app, you resume from exactly where you left off.
Bugs are fixable. If you find an issue, describe it in the review chat. The AI investigates, explains the root cause, and applies an atomic fix after your confirmation.
Test before merging. You can navigate to the worktree directory and run the project locally to verify everything works before merging to main.

Learn about protected workspaces →

Still have questions?

Get in touch